What's in a word?

Many in the public when hearing the term “Public Health” equate the term to a benefit to community or in medical terms physical wellness. Public health is in reality a political control movement derived of industry, hopeful the public mood can be controlled to suit the needs of their own profit margins.

Public health is not a state of being, but a state of mind, being directed by a well financed well organized group of tyrants imposing their totalitarian values on the rest of us.

From early years in schools we are taught life’s rules. Realities sculptured to create a culture conducive with consumerism. This makes us both good employees and good customers as the industry parallel to moral sociological values, in a reality motto;

Industry giveth and industry taketh away.

How do you accept as a fact of life a tractor trailer can haul 50 tons on average one million miles per truck lifespan and a consumer vehicle only travels one tenth of that distance prior to being scrapped. Or the fact that same truck gets close to 7 Miles per Gallon and Dodge brags about a Ram Diesel pickup truck while empty and hauling a single person which gets just over 10 Miles per Gallon.

We pride our selves in engineering yet the idea of standardizing road clearance in passenger vehicles could limit impact zones and through reinforcements where needed, we could reduce traffic fatalities tremendously. We know Oil contains the majority of the most toxic elements known to man, yet how many furnace oil tanks sit in basements permeating the evaporates throughout a home. Or consider the quantity of benzene inhaled at a gas pump or the diesel fumes inhaled by babies at bus and train stations all are acceptable, facts of life we can do little to cure or so we believe. It is strange the most silent demographic in community, the poor are the focus of the majority of political lobbies in the recent past. The lobbies always seem to hold high the promotions of increasing costs in limiting choices, making the impact much less on those who can most afford to avoid limitations or feel the sting of excessive taxation. After all, how many of the rich actually contribute to the tax system anywhere close to the degree the poor are forced to endure?

Although we can not fault advocates involved in the more popular lobby groups altogether, many do need an awakening in what they promote; a lot more often than not does not benefit society to any degree, close to the ambitions of the financiers of grandiose change.

From the public health institute

Our Philosophy:

Working Collaboratively to Change the Way People Think About Health

And this;

Our Mission

The Public Health Institute promotes health, well-being and quality of life for all people through research and evaluation, training and technical assistance, and by building community partnerships.

Consider what you see here “promoting health and well being, through research and evaluation” research not yet completed, but when it is, it will be used to promote a cause. How valid would you consider the value in the future “research” as they call it, in determining direction or in distributing Health advice to the public? The right of free will is undermined in coercive tactics, people make health decisions based on what they know or are being told. This is proof of a planned process which constitutes a criminal act Information affecting health decisions is deliberately deceptive; yet no one has the power to complain The media says “talk to the hand” they don’t want to know. Those in power as well simply look the other way.

From an unbiased scientific prospective real research is usually completed prior to deciding if action is required. This type of research is more properly described as political rhetoric or propaganda.

From the World Health Organization

Health is defined in WHO's Constitution as a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.

An NGO is the definition given to Industry financed Lobby groups and industry strategists involved in mutually beneficial projects

The objectives of WHO's relations with NGOs are to promote the policies, strategies and activities of WHO and, where appropriate, to collaborate with NGOs in jointly agreed activities to implement them. WHO may also seek to harmonize intersectoral interests among various sectoral bodies concerned in a country, regional or global setting.

Now take a look at the coercive activities in calls for research to promote action,

knowing specific research does not yet exist, yet announcing it will be used when it does to promote HIA initiatives

MeSH scope note: Critical and exhaustive investigation or experimentation, having for its aim the discovery of new facts and their correct interpretation, the revision of accepted conclusions, theories, or laws in the light of newly discovered facts, or the practical application of such new or revised conclusions, theories, or laws. (Webster, 3d ed)

Public Health is given prominence in the distortion of who they really are in fact when you take away the name and think of them as a political party, they would be known to be the very worst in respecting ethical or moral values we all hold dear. The chances a political party which supports the values demonstrated would have little chance of ever being elected in a democratic election.

They seek to let the existing parties do the dirty work for them in undermining the rights economies and stability of democracies where ever they exist. Strategies in favor of a totalitarian regime with little patience for dissenters. What political party would survive promoting only impositions based in unscientific calculations. Unscientific can be demonstrated in reviewing the actual studies giving them power, political conclusions are deliberately added to the research to create fears. Further what political party can now survive without making concessions to the public health dictators who seek world dominance in Globalization “we don’t live in silos” rhetoric.

Public Health is a political party, coercion in its finest hour. The denormalization process and social engineering on a Federal government website is akin to promoting fears of terrorist attacks, to moralize security certificates when in fact the only evidence we have such a danger exists; is in the sale of bags of fertilizer by undercover police who in reality were seeking from the start of the investigation, to arrest the purchasers.

The general public for the most part are reactive as opposed to proactive in fact the general mood in “it doesn’t matter who you vote for” attitudes is one of complacency. The turn out in national elections is anything but impressive, few would suspect this is partially by design we carry a defeatist attitude.

Never have the sales of anti depressants been higher or mistrust in our institutions of Law and government been lower. Dinosaurs are abundant although few have the ambition to speak for fear of political correct branding. People as a rule after all seek to be ambiguous and blend into a crowd. The opposition to voting on same sex marriage legislation in the Canadian legislature in pronouncements of media groups cries of bigotry, hides the underlining reality; if a vote were to occur the members supporting the legislation would thus be revealed, to support a bill many of their electorate would not support.

Health is not a word without duality in comprehension. The Health of society can be seen as in physical health but to a lesser known degree a state of mind conducive to controlling factions. The word Coercion is an interesting word avoided by public health advocates. In the death camps in Germany it was not necessary to drag screaming and kicking people into the ovens, they walked in as a choice derived of free will. This willingness was a direct result of coercion in the lies they were told first. Coercion is in the international books a crime. The methods of committing those crimes are heavily tied to psychological conditioning, in a large group in what we term propaganda. Politicians in seeking approval have allowed half truths and innuendo to evolve into a normal career discipline, enhancing career opportunities dependant on the level of success. Political opinion does not require accuracy or honesty, only an ability to make others believe it in rallying support. Politicians rarely point out inaccuracies in public perception because they at some point will seek to use those perceptions themselves. Besides bucking what the public believes without substantial proof, is usually met with strong opposition in the media, they like to use the spin too, most of the time they were paid to create it.

A further factor in considering the advantages of public health would be the basics in balancing personal and community rights. Health advocates deliberately undermine any recognition of personal and beyond those Autonomy rights as detractors slowing progress in ambitious campaigns despite how little though is really involved in the strategy process in respect to possible results. In Tobacco advertising bans we saw a huge downturn in sign companies ad agencies and most importantly in sponsoring community and sporting events. Where Tobacco industries invested billions back into communities those communities scrambled to make up the huge shortfalls which still have a lasting effect today. The taxation of the products increased poverty and lost sales which were minimal saw Layoffs in legitimate tax paying companies and a shift to organized crime made much more profitable as a result of Tobacco control. As the promotions involved a heavy handed one sided Social advertising campaigns slated as Denormalizing an industry the effect was more of a denormalizing of a significant proportion of our population. Increased hate and innuendos promoted by government and school systems playing the children against their own parents, despite the lack of credible science available. fears and suspicion where the order of the day.

Public Health made a huge victory this week, a milestone the day a Family Doctor announced on the largest media outlet in Canada “Second hand smoke is much more dangerous than smog” during the occurrence of a smog day in Toronto Canada of all places. The location in popular lore where promotions confirm in travel brochures a place surrounded by pristine lakes and wilderness. The idea this place could possibly see a smog day in February would be almost beyond comprehension a decade ago.

Indoor air is the battlefield yet the majority of Public health professionals decided our great outdoors are in need of protection as well. In considering the effects of indoor air we might be able to grasp the reality of outdoor air. In a smoky bar the highest concentrations of cigarette smoke at a level your eyes would burn and you would seek to open doors and ventilate the room is 250 Micrograms per cubic meter of air.

One microgram or millionth of a gram is one thousandth of a milligram or the weight of an amount of water one millionth of a meter cubed. Doctors prescribe medicine in milligrams or millionths of a gram a microgram is one thousand times smaller. One quarter of a milligram can cause us to be uncomfortable in a room the dangerous contents of that smoke are restricted to measurements in Nanograms and Pico grams thousandths and millionths of times smaller in quantity still. The idea someone could inhale an entire cubic meter in an hour is a gross exaggeration they promote. The maximum capacity of our lungs would prove the normal inhalation of an adult would be less than 2 cubic meters a day. Or a total of second hand smoke 375 micrograms per 8 hour day exposed. This is supporting an extreme danger in hospitality workers Health??? Consider this in the perhaps thousands of cubic meters inside a bar which dilutes second hand smoke along with air exchanges even at minimal levels promoted by the propaganda. How many cubic meters are existing out doors the source of indoor air. Although hundreds of cigarettes may be able to elevate the levels indoors to 250 micrograms per cubic meter of air how many would it take to raise the levels outdoors to sufficient levels which require a smog alert?

Real testing has demonstrated the reductions of particulate matter in outdoor air by as little as a single microgram could reduce mortality significantly 3% of total mortality at present, we are assured second hand smoke is much more dangerous in spite of common sense in observing reality. Public Health is adamant in it’s direction it will never encroach on the toes of it’s most generous benefactors or support any notion which suggests they could do us any harm. In considering historical free will decisions of millions who died in Death camps, where will we be marching next, in choices we make ourselves derived of free will?

Public health needs to be considered as organized crime and described in terms of who and not what, as a group among us who make the best use of coercive language in deceiving their victims. A pandemic or cancer which can be cured, by simply focusing the attention of the public on the fact they exist and how many suffer directly because of their actions.

A friend provided me with these links recently which demonstrate radical terrorists activities.

Criminals working within our communities a national security issue requiring immediate attention.

A long read, know the enemy;

google html version (faster download for us slow dial up sufferers)

appendix

google html of appendix

Fred Q

Litigation is about to become the next, huge growth industry.

Epidemiology is based in the acceptable level of risk as a baseline for comparisons in 1x 10^-4 or one of ten thousand This level can no longer be considered valid in the absence of linearity which established valid cause and effect principles. With no baseline for calculations how valid can we consider the calculations at all, in the face of substantially higher risks now accepted internationally as the basis for smoking ban and child abuse initiatives.

In Canada it is accepted by Health Canada; Environmental Tobacco Smoke ETS in unknown exposure levels causes the deaths of 100 children annually. The statistical association required in a 32 million population and the precision of those numbers demonstrates irrefutably a new acceptable risk factor well beyond the previous one in ten thousand standard. Due to this fact previous assessments and measurements in environmental toxins are proven invalid and of no protection to the population base whatsoever. Even the much higher 3000 ETS deaths in a 32 million population is beyond the previous acceptable risk in a population base standard for epidemiological assessments. Media presentations of Healthcare professionals depicting a statistical rise from 1 to 1.3 in comparative studies as a 30% increased risk establishes any increase no matter how small, or regardless of allowances for errors and confounding effects as unacceptable risk in our new no safe level exists standard.

In the assessment of ventilation technologies in critical review of the Burswood Casino, James Repace stated in his opinion with a level of RSP existing at a high average of 250 Micrograms per cubic meter of air the level was known to be 10,000 times the known safe level in air water and food according to the American EPA. This established proof of a widely accepted fact, the direct inhalation at that level made Environmental Tobacco smoke much more deadly than direct inhalation of Benzene, Chlorine or even Dioxins at previously believed to be known safe levels. In fact few toxins or carcinogens are known which would prove to be more deadly than second hand smoke. The levels of inhaled primary smoke while diluted by only one half liter of air in combination with coincidental exposures to ETS inhaled by a smoker as opposed a full cubic meter of air dilatant or 2000 half liter inhalations were also exceeded in the assessment of harm. Non smoker half liter inhalations, averaged at 10 inhalations per minute and 2400 litters per 8 hour day 1.4 cubic meters per non smoker. Total non smoker inhalations per 8 hour day can be seen to be approximately 375 micrograms RSP [Respiratory smoke particulate]. When you consider the levels of exposure in 1960 before the drastic reductions in primary smoking and unrestricted exposures to the smoke at or away from work and the resulting consequences we have to accept the smoke is becoming more dangerous or the no safe level assessments are indeed valid, dashing all possibilities of linear association. Biological plausibility was lacking in assessing the epidemiologic calculations however the general scientific and medical communities have accepted the theories of venturing beyond association but now establishing causation of disease in non linear proportions resulting from exposures, valid in thousands of public statements by scientific and medical experts globally. This allowed Stanton Glanz the berth of the incredible statement he made recently "Secondhand smoke doubles our risk of breast cancer. The risk you run to go smokefree? Zero."

Now we have created a much larger problem in order to substantiate a plausible level of risk to this proportion we have to dismiss all previous linearity theories. The Heather Crowe case in which a hospitality worker in Canada based on expert testimony establishing cause and effect, with no levels of inhalation or exposures to confounders known and despite the fact fellow employees with the same or higher levels of exposure did not contract cancer due to exposure. The result; linearity is now legally known to be invalid.

The Pandora’s box now open invalidates environmental testing and known safe levels in all potentially toxic exposures by comparison. How could that same compensation board now reject claims of workplace exposures of any toxin at any level resulting in an associated disease with any level of association? Beyond that how can we ever successfully prosecute environmental damages with no valid science with which to establish evidence? When successfully argued to a supreme court decision, this would have the potential to bankrupt every insurance company and workers compensation board on the planet and bog down all the courts with damage claims for decades. The tobacco industry can now enhance their chances to win any claim of damages, with a simple question of an expert brought forward to establish tobacco caused a specific harm. Do you believe Linearity in cause and effect is valid?, the response is a no win situation. Damned if you do and Damned if you don’t. The American EPA decision can be held high as proof in deciding to classify ETS as a deadly carcinogen in the absence of plausible Biological and Timeline observations, as the champion of industries who can now avoid prosecution or at very least make those prosecutions much more difficult to achieve.

Use of the same American government standards has created new theories with similar basis to blossom in battling Obesity pandemics and calculations which validify total population inoculations in place of as per need in dealing with known to be rare Papa Loma virus inspired uterine cancers. A new reality is emerging in medical knowledge we will eventually know how credible the experts remain, as an effect of timeline observations. This would of course be dependant on the continued ability to sustain consensus or political science in media presentations indefinitely.

References

James Repace et al;

http://www.acosh.org/art/critical_evaluation.pdf

Stanton Glanz et al;

http://www.ucsf.edu/its/listserv/stanglantz-l/0516.html

Protection of the new non linear standard at the American EPA allowed them to reject research with a Biological assay.

Et al DR. George D. Thurston, Sc. D.

http://www.cleanairstandards.org/filemanager/download/156/EPA_GDT_testimony061.doc

et al, The American Lung Association

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060326/NEWS06/603260403/1083/LIVING01

Media presentations

http://www.cleanairstandards.org/article/articleview/464/1/41/

Research attributed to the professional oversight of Dr. Neil Coleshaw of Doctors for a smoke free planet, during his employment at the World Health Organization. The research failed to express the actual precision of risk now accepted and expressed in non linear standards.

http://jncicancerspectrum.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/jnci;90/19/1440

Today a new reality unfolds simply being exposed to ETS is unacceptable risk, regardless of the level or duration of that exposure With the new gold standard in place; one wonders as we eventually eliminate all toxins and carcinogens from our environment, if any manufacturer or civilization itself can survive the onslaught of ad agency created fear as a basis for future litigation

http://ottsun.canoe.ca/News/OttawaAndRegion/2006/06/14/1630890-sun.html

News flash; Deadly attack at the Ontario legaslature

This morning at the Ontario Provincial legislature an incident occurred which may have led to the deaths of thousands luckily vigilant security forces took swift action and minimized the damages although it may be some time before the full extent of this tragedy will be fully understood. A group of tourists who had done a walk through tour are the apparent suspects. The use of police horses to keep anti government protesters in line may have led to the exasperation of the already deadly situation originating on the lawn in front of the building.

130 suspects were immediately rounded up for questioning. Police sources revealed; the investigators are seeking possibly more than one suspect in the distribution of the deadly substance leading to the near disaster. Tourists engrossed in capturing that perfect shot may have [although a deliberate act has not been ruled out completely] unwittingly distributed the deadly substance all through the halls and right into the legislative chambers which at the time were not in use in service of the public as is normally the case. Luckily the familiar pungent odor was noticed quickly which set security forces to action. A sample was found almost immediately and rushed to the forensics lab for analysis. The report was decisive the 7200 chemicals revealed by mass spectrometer testing included 44 known carcinogens and 27 deadly and possibly contagious viruses. Results set the extraction team to commence an immediate process driven action; donning respirators and rubber gloves they went to work attempting to remove the dangerous solid matter substance. Pine sol antiseptic cleaner was used extensively to eliminate some of the virulent aspects of the off gasses.

According to overwhelming scientific proof as illustrated by Heath care authorities in the past 5 years of investigating second hand smoke. It would take gale force winds exceeding 300 miles per hour to excavate gasses from a room even then only a 95% success rate can be achieved. The much deadlier off gasses seen in this incident could prove to be much more difficult, it would take perhaps a full 4 year legislative term to rid the public spaces of Liberal doses of horseshit off gasses. The solid material aspect would remain even in the existence of gale force winds. Testing revealed the inclusion of scores of deadly viruses equating the potential deadly effects of a dirty bomb wherever this substance is distributed. This would substantiate the fact no safe level can be permitted ventilation can never be effective in warding off such a deadly toxin.

Epidemiological testing reveals more than 95% of total population mortality occurs in every disease category within 3 days of being exposed to some form of Liberal doses of Horseshit. This makes Liberal doses of Horseshit the most deadly workplace hazard ever known to man far exceeding even those results found in tobacco smoke. Hospitality venues have known the risks for decades and banned the substance in all eating areas. Movie theatres Bingo halls and most places large crowds would be normally expected to go, all have similar although inconsistent rules. The Royal winter fair has no such health protections exposing hundreds of thousands of defenseless children every year to Liberal doses of Horseshit. Every housewife in the country has self imposed bans, as her mother did going back generations in protecting their families from this deadly hazard.

We need to awaken the public to this deadly hazard it could be proposed a re-use of existing advertising promo materials. Everywhere the words second hand smoke or ETS was formerly displayed the replacement of the term Liberal doses of Horseshit could be installed. Waste not, want not, in the spirit of recycling in government sector expenditures. Ad agency spin could be replicated in social engineering strategies saving billions in expenditures this time around. The sitting government is toying with a perfume ban while a much more offensive odor is invading the sinus cavities of millions every day. The smoking ban was implemented with only 44 statistical Ontarians dying daily due to smoking related diseases yet we ignore a hazard easily 4 times as deadly in real numbers responsible for almost 200,000 mortalities annually and 176 deaths in Ontario every day from Liberal Horseshit related diseases. The message is clear the public demands action, we need a bill to level the playing field affording protection to all workers in the province who would be forced to endure deadly long term exposure through the term of a full shift while an inconsiderate co worker sits oblivious to the hazard he inflicts on everyone else in the room. Simply cleaning his shoes could make life safer for those around him yet many would sit in denial refusing to alleviate the situation because shame or ego would not allow them to just look. Parents who expose their kids to Liberal Horseshit should be labeled as abusers and be relieved of parental rights. No one should be allowed employment who would callously expose defenseless co-workers to Liberal Horseshit related diseases. I call on legislators everywhere to ban Liberal Horseshit from all public spaces as well as outdoor patios and within 50 feet of the entrances of Hospitals and hospitality venues.

Healthcare advocates need to get active in enacting the public protections required immediately. We need to create a symbolic graphic to be distributed and displayed in all public spaces. Perhaps a graphic depicting Dalton falling out of the business end of a horse, donning his traditional black suit with red Liberal armband with a couple of strategic council poll reports tied to his feet as parachutes slowing his inevitable decline. If we all work together we can rid our planet of the suspicious smell of Liberal Horseshit and all of it's deadly consequences.